Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2003/06/25
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]In a message dated 6/25/03 9:08:49 AM, mvhoward@mac.com writes: << The only possibly interesting thing about this is the technical achievement of grafting a digital back to an existing film camera, while allowing its use as either by switching back and forth. But in the Real World, the question is how interesting is that? Especially when you take those $5,200 into consideration. >> Oh come on. In the real world using a Leica anything is a joke. People think you're crazy to spend a thousand dollars for a 50mm lens, a couple thousand for something slightly more exotic. If you like Leica glass and think it is worth it for the money, you ignore the naysayers. If you don't think the Leica glass is worth the money you go for a Holga , drive a Ford Fiesta, sip ripple and wear Prada knockoffs sold at Wallmart. Yeah, $5,200 is a lot of money. So were the original digital offerings that came out from Canon, Nikon and the other gods of the digital world. I imagine that as time goes on and technology moves forward prices will go down, 10MP goes up. For those of us who like film and traditional cameras, I like this approach. At some point in time, if I want the immediacy of digital, I have that opportunity using it on a system I already know and use for traditional film. I give Leica a thumbs up on this one. And expect that it will expand in the future. - -kim - -- To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html