Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2003/06/11
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]eric korenman asked: > Didn't know there WAS a 21-35mm vario. > Other users happy with it? Other than $$$ and f4.0, any downsides? > What is average used price? > > I had a 24mm elmarit for a time - Although I loved the results, it was a bit > much for for every shot. > The 21-35mm seems like a fantastic working range.<<< Hi Eric, Yep it's a great lens and the 21-35 range is a good working range and companion to the 35-70 and 80-200. I use all three on many of my assignments, primarily outdoor shoots due to the f 3.5 on the 35-70 and f4.0 on the 80-200, 21-35. I don't find the f 4.0 a problem, obviously not out doors, but it is a bit of a bind shooting indoors. But if I have to, I use Neopan 1600, souped in XTOL 1:1 and it works just fine. Actually I've pushed it to 3200 a few times and managed to get away with it. Actually this Saturday and Sunday I'll be using all three of these lenses shooting rowing championships here in Victoria on Elk Lake. I have no fear of failure from the glass, but more from the possibility of rain. :-( The 21-35 is a fine lens and if you haven't tried one see if you can get a loaner / rental and give it a try with a few rolls and you'll be committed to purchase.:-) ted - -- To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html