Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2003/06/10
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]If you read the post again you will see that Henning was referring to density rather than weight. Henning's point being that the Nokton is not as heavy as you might expect if only you judged it on its size as compared to the Summilux. For example, the Nokton may look twice as large as the Summilux but, due to its lower density, the Nokton does not weigh twice as much Summilux. John Collier On Tuesday, June 10, 2003, at 07:38 AM, grduprey@rockwellcollins.com wrote: > > Last time I checked, 490 Grams is heavier than 310 Grams, so the > Nokton is > heavier than the Summilux not lighter. - -- To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html