Archived posting to the
Leica Users Group, 2003/06/09
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index]
[Home]
[Search]
Subject: Re: [Leica] Digilux 1 v. Panasonic clone +haiku!
From: "Christopher Williams" <leicachris@worldnet.att.net>
Date: Mon, 9 Jun 2003 22:55:17 -0500
References: <5C95B2FD378816428E11770FBCAB5F48167625@gmsrmail.gmsr-inside.com> <003601c32ef0$90a27320$956df7a5@mindspring.com> <010801c32ef4$86161d40$085e96ac@aoldsl.net> <004e01c32efd$3ce28e70$191c530c@MacPhisto> <00cc01c32f02$92f25160$956df7a5@mindspring.com>
Yes, RAW is the best for photoshoping, but it takes extra software to open.
One more extra step is not on the minds of normal non-professional photo
folks. Sometimes explaining TIFF is hard enough.
Speaking of Digilux's, I saw a couple of them watching the Stanley Cup on
TV.
Chris
- ----- Original Message -----
From: "Gary Williams"
Subject: Re: [Leica] Digilux 1 v. Panasonic clone +haiku!
> > Right about print size Sonny. My cheap little Lika Leica LC-20 can print
a
> > nice 8x10 from 2mp's. I don't think you will see RAW in any
> Panasonic/Leica.
>
> How come? Is this not the best way to save a file for optimal Photoshop
> manipulation?
>
> Gary
- --
To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html
In reply to:
Message from "Irving Greines" <igreines@GMSR.com> ([Leica] Is it a bargain: Digilux 1 v. Panasonic clone)
Message from "Gary Williams" <nasmformyzombie@mindspring.com> (Re: [Leica] Is it a bargain: Digilux 1 v. Panasonic clone)
Message from "\(SonC\) Sonny Carter" <sonc@sonc.com> ([Leica] Digilux 1 v. Panasonic clone +haiku!)
Message from "Christopher Williams" <leicachris@worldnet.att.net> (Re: [Leica] Digilux 1 v. Panasonic clone +haiku!)
Message from "Gary Williams" <nasmformyzombie@mindspring.com> (Re: [Leica] Digilux 1 v. Panasonic clone +haiku!)