Re: [Leica] RE: Wide zooms

[Jerry Lehrer <jerryleh@pacbell.net>]

BD

FPITA

Jerry

bdcolen wrote:

> That was, indeed, the sloppily worded question. I will attempt greater
> precision in the future. ;-)
>
> B. D.
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us
> [mailto:owner-leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us] On Behalf Of (SonC)
> Sonny Carter
> Sent: Wednesday, May 28, 2003 6:36 PM
> To: leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us
> Subject: Re: [Leica] RE: Wide zooms
>
> hmmm,  yes, but also on other movie cameras
> the question was "show me an f 1.4 zoom. ;-)"
> Steve and Johnny did.
>
> And for the record, Angenieux had a  f.95 Cine lens a long time ago.
> So, Noctilux is not the fastest production lens made.
>
> SonC
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Jerry Lehrer" <jerryleh@pacbell.net>
> To: <leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us>
> Sent: Wednesday, May 28, 2003 4:18 PM
> Subject: Re: [Leica] RE: Wide zooms
>
> > Steve
> >
> > But aren't those cine lenses as used on the Bolex movie cameras?
> >
> > Jerry
> >
> > Steve LeHuray wrote:
> >
> > > BD Colen wrote:
> > >
> > > > Not just contemporary primes - primes have always outclassed
> > > > zooms. ALTHOUGH - the better zooms today would really eliminate
> > > > the necessity of using primes, were it not for the additional
> > > > advantage primes can offer in terms of lens speed - show me an f
> > > > 1.4 zoom. ;-)
> > > >
> > >
> > > ...sure, I have a Angenieux 16-44mm/f1.2 and a Angenieux
> > > 9.5-57mm/1.9
> and a
> > > Angenieux 12-120/f2.2
> > >
> > > sl
> > > --
> > > To unsubscribe, see
> > > http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html
> >
> > --
> > To unsubscribe, see
> > http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html
>
> --
> To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html
>
> --
> To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html

- --
To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html