Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2003/05/28
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]The 17-35 Nikon lens, which I use and like, is quite good, Mark - but, no, it does NOT blow Canon's out of the water.;-) And, yes, the ED1s is expensive - but B&H is selling it for $7500, not the 9K you quoted, and that is just $500 more than the price being quoted for the vaporware Leica D9 BACK which reportedly will not have a full-size sensor. B. D. - -----Original Message----- From: owner-leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us [mailto:owner-leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us] On Behalf Of Mark Rabiner Sent: Wednesday, May 28, 2003 3:56 AM To: leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us Subject: Re: [Leica] Re: Leica Users digest V24 #311 Tina Manley wrote: > > At 08:47 AM 5/26/2003 +0100, you wrote: > >BTW Tina I am not aware that Canon have made specifically digital > >lenses yet (Nikon have) Frank > > No, Canon made a full-frame digital camera so they don't have to use > specifically digital lenses ;-) > > Their 14 to 35 lens is actually 14 to 35!! > > Tina > And their 9 grand full chip camera is 9 grand! That add up to be 2 Leica MP's each with their own Noctilux's and a suitcase filled with film. (Or diaper bag, your choice) Nikon's wide zoom is the 17-35mm f/2.8 D ED-IF AF-S lens and is said to blow Canon's right out of the water. I'm getting one this week. There is talk of a 2/3's format for film. As lenses will be made to fit this size why not take advantage of it for the stupid people who would ever want to shoot real film again. Flim. Analog people. That's all the real estate I need! Mark Rabiner Portland, Oregon USA http://www.rabinergroup.com - -- To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html - -- To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html