Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2003/05/27
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]> >I've not yet tested this camera > >with my R lenses, with an adapter, but it could be the best of two > >worlds, specially the 21-35 Vario Elmar truly better than Canon 16-35 L > > I would like someone to SHOW ME (or anyone) the difference in finished > images, between using the 21-35 Vario Elmar and the Canon 16-35 L, on a EOS > 1D body. I do not believe that a digital sensor has the ability to collect > enough of the right kind of image data that signifies or plays-up the > differences between these two lenses. Truly stunning digital images are not > the result of a particular lens and sensor, they are the result of in > camera and out of camera image processing algorithms. Jim, I've always wondered ... will digital bring on the end of trademark adoration? From what I understand, a good Photoshopper can improve on an image that was made with a good lens, like a Canon lens, to such a degree that we'll no longer see the difference between it and a lens that is supposed to be better. Daniel - -- To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html