Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2003/05/10
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Hello Jerry, hello Steve & y'all: Jim Lager and Erwin Puts both have the first 50/1,4 Summilux being introduced in 1959. Puts says the recomputed lens was introduced in1961. Lager says: "About 1962, at serial number 1844001, the Summilux was recomputed to give even better performance. It appears that official acknowledgemenent of this change did not occur until late 1965." Typical of Leitz at the time. My Leitz lens records show ser # 1844001 falling in the 1961 production: #1827001-1913000. Puts 1, Lager 0. Gianni Rogliatti is the guy who got things confused by stating in his book that "in 1966 the new lens design came along: totally different it had yet seven glass elements, but the three front elements were not cemented and there were two pairs cemented to the rear [sic] of the diaphragm. Set only in bayonet mount and black, this lens did not change on the outside from the previous model." I know Rogliatti is wrong for two reasons: the 1961 revised lens was made in both silver and black; I owned one of them in silver, #2028798 (1964 production). You can tell the difference externally as the front retaining rings, the ones with the written lens description on them, have different pitches, the early lens is shallower, the revised lens is deeper. We all know these things are just tools. We use them as tools. But while many if not most of you here on the LUG think people like me are nuts to get into this stuff, it is somehow fun to poke around and cogitate on the background - the history - of an important 20th Century artifact. The Saratoga Auto Museum Ferrari exhibit opened May 1 and I was interviewed (about 30 seconds I was warned) and asked "what is it like to own a Ferrari?" My answer was: "after all, it is just a car. Still, there is no denying a sense of fun in having a relationship to the heritage and history of Ferrari and the unparalleled racing success of these cars. But the real joy is in driving them, the tactile sensation of connection with the road, the responsiveness of the car and the speed. After all, Mr. Ferrari did not build his cars to go into museums, he built them to drive the 24 Heures du Mans and win. Leicas weren't built to go into museums, they were built to give photographers the tools with which to make (potentially) great images. The fact that some people (today) buy Leicas to keep in collections is a recognition of the special kind of tools that they are, just as some people today buy Ferraris not to drive but to collect. It's not a perfect parallel but it ain't too remote. Seth LaK 9 P.S. the 50/1,4 Summilux is indeed a great lens. So much so that while I thoroughly respect Ted, Tina and all of you who need and use the Noctilux professionally, I perceive my need for the added stop so rarely that I am unwilling to accept the burden of weight and bulk - and the expense - for a stop that I can usually capture with faster and pushed film. - ----- Original Message ----- From: "Steve LeHuray" <steve@streetphoto.net> To: <leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us> Sent: Saturday, May 10, 2003 10:48 AM Subject: Re: [Leica] Questions on Leica's Latest Screw Mount Lenses - Circa 1999 > > Seth > > > > I believe that it was introduced in 1959, and changed in 1964 > > OR 1966, depending on whose voices we hear. > > > > Jerry > > ...whenever -- the 50/1.4 is a great lens. > > sl > > > > > Seth Rosner wrote: > > > >> Pretty remarkable for a lens whose optical design I understand to have been > >> unchanged since introduction in 1964 (apart from some slight coating > >> improvements); next year it will celebrate its 40th anniversary. How's that > >> for world-class design? > >> > >> Seth LaK 9 > >> > >> ----- Original Message ----- > >> From: "Jerry Lehrer" <jerryleh@pacbell.net> > >> To: <leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us> > >> Sent: Friday, May 09, 2003 10:28 PM > >> Subject: Re: [Leica] Questions on Leica's Latest Screw Mount Lenses - Circa > >> 1999 > >> > >> > Greg > >> > > >> > That Summilux was a killer lens! Gorgeous results. Unfortunately, > >> > I didn't even think about the weight. > >> > > >> > From what I have been able to glean, the lenses were identical > >> > to the M versions. except for the mount. > >> > >> -- > >> To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html > > > > -- > > To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html > > > > -- > To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html - -- To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html