Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2003/04/30
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Jim -and everyone else - thanks for your comments. ernie At 09:08 AM 4/30/03 -0700, you wrote: >Ernest, > From f2.0 on, I can't tell the difference between these two lenses. The >Summilux 35 ASPH is my most used lens. My wife shoots with a Summicron 35 >ASPH and they look the same to me. Hers is chrome, so the weight between >the two seems about the same, though I know the chrome cron is around 65g >lighter than the black lux. > >They're both great lenses. You can't go wrong with either one. It's simply >a matter of whether you need the extra stop. > >--Jim > >----- Original Message ----- >From: "Ernest Nitka" <enitka@twcny.rr.com> >To: <leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us> >Sent: Wednesday, April 30, 2003 6:39 AM >Subject: [Leica] 35/2 ASPH vs 35/1.4 ASPH > > > > While we are on the topic of 35/1.2 vs 35/1.4 I would like to know from > > those on the list who have had/used 35/1.4 ASPH compared to the 35/2 ASPH > > 'cron what are their comments. I know it's silly to preseverate on which >hi > > quality, expensive 35 one uses but enquiring minds want to know. > > > > ernie > > > > -- > > To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html > >-- >To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html - -- To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html