Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2003/04/26

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: Re: [Leica] Questions about consistancy within a project
From: "J. Gilbert Plantinga" <jgp@gilplant.com>
Date: Sat, 26 Apr 2003 08:06:46 -0400

So far I've pushed the 400TX both 1 and two stops, and next I'm going 
to try it at 200 and perhaps even 3200 (!). Kodak's time for XTOL 1:1 
seems right, but they don't recommend any additional time for a 
one-stop push. My negs came out thin that way, but I've added some time 
and they look great now. There is still grain, it's finer than the old 
Tri-X but just as tight, not mushy, and the tonal curve of the new film 
seems about the same as the old -- gorgeous!

Gilbert

On Saturday, April 26, 2003, at 07:43  AM, Christer Almqvist wrote:

> I may be wrong, but the impression I get is that you are not 
> thoroughly familiar with all of these films. If that is so, then the 
> first piece of advice must be: do not use any film on summer long 
> project unless you have thoroughly tested it and become fully familiar 
> with it.
>
> When testing the films you may find that the Neopan 1600 does not give 
> you much advantage over a slightly pushed Tri-X, which would then 
> eliminate one of the three films. From tests that I have read, but not 
> done myself,  I think the new Tri-X has less grain and more acutance 
> than the old one. Testers are questioning the correctness of the 
> developing times published by Kodak, so again test this yourself.
>
> If you want to stick to one film you may wish to consider shooting 
> Tri-X at half the speed on the box, or less, and develop accordingly. 
> APX 100 is not considered a super-fine-grain-high-acutance film so the 
> Tri-X may not be far off quality wise. Otherwise both films should be 
> well suited for the environmental portraits.
>
> Please post some sample this fall, and have fun - and lots of success.
>
> Chris
>
>
>
>> I'm currently beginning a summer-long project. At this point I've 
>> shot three
>> different films: Tri-X, Neopan 1600, and APS 100, primarily because 
>> of the
>> different light I was shooting in. These are all portraits - 
>> environmental
>> portraits you might say.
>>
>> Is it desirable to shoot with the same film or is changing film okay? 
>> I think
>> I'll mostly be using APS 100 but there will be evenings when Tri-X 
>> will be
>> required. I hope I won't have the heavy overcast to require the 
>> Neopan again.
>>
>> Your  thoughts would be appreciated.
>>
>> Thanks
>>
>> Adam

- --
To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html

Replies: Reply from Rei Shinozuka <shino@panix.com> (Re: [Leica] Questions about consistancy within a project)