Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2003/04/23

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: Re: [Leica] Re: Tri-elmar flare
From: Alastair Firkin <firkin@ncable.net.au>
Date: Wed, 23 Apr 2003 21:51:26 +1000

Yes Steve: I dread to think of the cost --- on top of the lens ;-)

On Wednesday, Apr 23, 2003, at 17:47 Australia/Melbourne, Steve 
Unsworth wrote:

> Alastair
>
> Leica will be more than happy to sell you one ;-)
>
> Steve
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us
> [mailto:owner-leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us] On Behalf Of firkin
> Sent: 23 April 2003 07:46
> To: leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us
> Subject: [Leica] Re: Tri-elmar flare
>
>
> [big5] williamhu99 writes:
>
>> Why not supply a hood with the lens??? I would say the
>> same words as you. It is incredible that such
>> expensive does not come with a hood. Thanks God that
>> it is a metal hood, not plastic one. I would go crazy
>> if it were a plastic hood and ask us to pay for it.
>
> I can only agree. Pain. I'll now have go into hood "hunting"
>
> Cheers
>
> Alastair Firkin @ work ;-)
>
> http://www.afirkin.com
> http://www.familyofman2.com
>
>
> --
> To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html
>
>
Alastair

- --
To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html

Replies: Reply from Jerry Lehrer <jerryleh@pacbell.net> (Re: [Leica] Re: Tri-elmar flare)