Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2003/04/20

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: Re: [Leica] PAW 16 dlridings
From: "GeeBee" <graham@geebeespaw.freeserve.co.uk>
Date: Sun, 20 Apr 2003 21:03:15 +0100
References: <Pine.SOL.4.44-qp.0304202125590.15967-100000@hedvig.uio.no>

From: "Daniel Ridings" <daniel.ridings@muspro.uio.no>
To: <leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us>; <paw@topica.com>
Sent: 20 April 2003 20:27
Subject: [Leica] PAW 16 dlridings


> Still mucking around with the new Tri-X.
>
> http://www.dlridings.com/paw2003/16.html
>
========================================================
Hi Daniel,

Have you found any difference with the new Tri X? I have been using it with
some D76 that was ordered in for me at my local camera store. The D76 was
marked 'Pro D76 for commercial and professional use only'. Either the new
Tri X, the 'Pro D76' or a combination of the two has just about ruined my
last film. The contrast is so fierce as to be unmanageable. Will Larsen on
IRC gave me a link to the development technique for the 'Pro D76' which
leaves out the continuous agitation for the first 30 seconds of development,
which I normally use,  in favour of 10 seconds maximum. Hopefully the new
initial agitation time will correct the problem, if not I will sling it and
try to get my usual D76. The bottom two shots at the following link will
give you an example of the problem.

http://www.geebeephoto.com/html/previews.html

Got so carried away with the techno stuff I almost forgot to mention the
high quality of the portrait you posted :-)

- --Graham




- --
To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html

In reply to: Message from Daniel Ridings <daniel.ridings@muspro.uio.no> ([Leica] PAW 16 dlridings)