Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2003/04/17

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: RE: [Leica] Incident vs. Reflective Metering
From: "bdcolen" <bdcolen@earthlink.net>
Date: Thu, 17 Apr 2003 17:28:48 -0400

Take a look at Nachtwey's photos, and you can see that he takes the
technical end of his business as seriously as he does the vision end.

B. D.

- -----Original Message-----
From: owner-leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us
[mailto:owner-leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us] On Behalf Of Steve
Unsworth
Sent: Thursday, April 17, 2003 5:20 PM
To: leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us
Subject: RE: [Leica] Incident vs. Reflective Metering


I found it interesting watching the James Nachtway documentary that he
use a pro Canon camera but still took incident readings - and this was
using Tri-X a film I've always though to be exposure friendly.

Steve (who normally wiggles his M6 around looking for something neutral
:-)

- -----Original Message-----
From: owner-leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us
[mailto:owner-leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us] On Behalf Of Dave Olson
Sent: 17 April 2003 22:50
To: leica-users-digest@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us
Subject: [Leica] Incident vs. Reflective Metering



Just read with interest the comments on relfective versus incident light

reading/metering. Having been a long time believer in hand held meters I

just would like to throw my experiences into the pot.

<big snip in the interests of bandwidth>


- --
To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html

- --
To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html