Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2003/04/17

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: Re: [Leica] metereless
From: Jerry Lehrer <jerryleh@pacbell.net>
Date: Thu, 17 Apr 2003 09:40:38 -0700
References: <000201c304f3$0b214680$9c973051@steveuns>

Steve

I have a feeling that you are confusing an incident light meter
with a reflected light meter.

Jerry

Steve Unsworth wrote:

> Don't think so, you're measuring the light that's falling onto an object,
> not the light reflected from it. A black object will appear black because it
> absorbs more of the light that's falling onto it than a white object.
>
> Steve
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us
> [mailto:owner-leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us] On Behalf Of Andrew Moore
> Sent: 17 April 2003 14:45
> To: leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us
> Subject: Re: [Leica] metereless
>
> > A hand held meter is simple to use, quick and fool proof.
>
> Almost, anyway -- I suppose black still absorbs and white still reflects
> more like, so even with an incident reading you still need to take that into
> account, right?
>
> --
> To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html

- --
To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html

In reply to: Message from "Steve Unsworth" <mail@steveunsworth.co.uk> (RE: [Leica] metereless)