Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2003/04/17
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Andrew Moore <andrew.m.moore@verizon.net> wrote: > >> Don't think so, you're measuring the light that's falling >> onto an object, not the light reflected from it. > > That's exactly why I'm thinking the measurement still needs > some compensation -- you're measuring the light falling onto > it. If the subject is particularly light or dark and I want a print with full tonal range I'd think an incident reading would need adjustment. Doug Herr Birdman of Sacramento http://www.wildlightphoto.com - -- To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html