Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2003/04/16
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Sonny, what says you? Obviously you must be happy > with your Digilux. Does it have the "glow?" > > // richard <http://www.imagecraft.com> Mine is the Lumix LC5, anad so far I am quite happy with it. http://www.sonc.com/Chief_Davis.htm http://www.sonc.com/ladoris.htm I wouldn't call it a glow, but it sure does a nice job with only a tiny bit of lag. I still carry my M6 though. Sonny - ----- Original Message ----- From: "Richard F. Man" <richard@imagecraft.com> To: <leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us> Sent: Wednesday, April 16, 2003 2:00 AM Subject: Re: [Leica] New Leica digital M camera (well nearly) > At 06:34 AM 4/16/2003 +0000, leicauser@ntlworld.com wrote: > >It does look a little like an M camera :-) > > http://www.leica-camera.com/imperia/md/content/pdf/d-lux/2.pdf > >.. > > Hope Springs Eternal. It looks nothing like an M :-) On the OM list, we > keep wishing for an OM-5 or OM-6, until Olympus cancels the OM :-( > > I wonder - how good are the lens? Both the Digilux and this D-Lux are based > on the Panasonic Lumix cameras right? Do the original Panasonic have the > same lens or only the Leica badged ones have the Leica designed (but not > manufactured?) lenses? Sonny, what says you? Obviously you must be happy > with your Digilux. Does it have the "glow?" > > // richard <http://www.imagecraft.com> > <http://www.dragonsgate.net/mailman/listinfo> Mine is the Lumix LC5, anad so far I am quite happy with it. I wouldn't call it a glow, but it sure does a nice job with only a tiny bit of lag. I still carry my M6 though. Sonny > > -- > To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html - -- To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html