Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2003/04/13

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: Re: [Leica] OT: KL vs PKL
From: Mark Rabiner <mark@rabinergroup.com>
Date: Sun, 13 Apr 2003 17:28:04 -0700
References: <062001c30206$00b2c100$056fa8c0@MillStone>

Lew Schwartz wrote:
> 
>         Just getting back into Kodachromes again and I came across the
> price difference between Kodachrome 200's KL around $7.50/roll and PKL
> at $20.00/roll. What on earth makes a 35mm film worth $20.00 a roll?
> 
> -Lew S
> 
> --
> To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html

B&H? I just priced a Linhof 612 with them and in England it was just
about half the price.

Precision camera in texas  pkl at 13.29
kl which is the not pro version at 10.39
Digital photo has that film at 6.85
the B&H KL price is 7.35.

But I'd go for the pro anything it's much less of a hassle and who knows
maybe the D-max is better.

(Was KL Supermans dad?)

Cambridge has PKL at $9.74.

Sold!




Mark Rabiner
Portland, Oregon USA
http://www.rabinergroup.com
- --
To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html

In reply to: Message from "Lew Schwartz" <lew@clsystems.com> ([Leica] OT: KL vs PKL)