Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2003/04/04
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Eric Is it really that important when you consider that you probably won't enlarge the negative beyond 11x14 anyway? I dearly love the old f2,8 Summaron for that size prints. Also it is small and light. Jerry faneuil wrote: > To reply to myself - I did some more googling. > The 4th gen, pre-ASPH, 35 summicron seems to get high marks. > > Anyone gone ASPH 35, only to go back to pre-ASPH ? > > Eric > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "faneuil" <leica_korenman@hotmail.com> > To: "LUG" <leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us> > Sent: Friday, April 04, 2003 6:20 PM > Subject: [Leica] Alternate to current 35mm ASPH? > > > I know that the current 35's are magnificent performers, but > > having handled both the current 35mm ASPH 'cron and 'lux, they both seem > > awfully bulky. > > I am looking for a 35mm lens that would be easier to travel and walk > around > > with. > > > > What would be better, lighter alternate Leica manufactured M 35mm lens to > > the current ASPH models? > > > > thanks, > > Eric > > -- > > To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html > > > -- > To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html - -- To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html