Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2003/04/03
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Absolutely, Tina. In the composite photo we have a dramatic 'war photo,' of threatening military figure and pathetic father and child - something clearly missing from the two photos that were actually taken. B. D. - -----Original Message----- From: owner-leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us [mailto:owner-leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us] On Behalf Of Tina Manley Sent: Wednesday, April 02, 2003 8:35 PM To: leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us Subject: RE: [Leica] fired for photoshopping At 03:49 PM 4/2/2003 -0800, you wrote: >BTW, if you actually saw the images ( LA Times today, page A6) you >would notice that the actual changes made did not change the intent or >message of the photo. It improved the image. I totally disagree. It changed the entire intent of the photo. In the original two photos, the soldier is not pointing a weapon at the father carrying the child. In the composite photo he is. The difference in the two photos is astounding to me. Tina Tina Manley, ASMP http://www.tinamanley.com photos available from: http://www.pdiphotos.com http://www.mira.com http://www.agpix.com http://www.newscom.com - -- To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html - -- To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html