Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2003/04/02

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: Re: [Leica] fired for photoshopping
From: Slobodan Dimitrov <sld@earthlink.net>
Date: Wed, 02 Apr 2003 22:50:59 -0800
References: <NEBBJDFBIKOBILIKPPBNKEJMMBAA.red735i@earthlink.net>

Sometime ago, a publisher of the LA Times, stated that it's the paper's
duty to be engaged in social engineering. I got the impression that
anything was permissible under that declaration. 
Slobodan Dimitrov

Frank Filippone wrote:
> 
> And what do you read in a newspaper or see in paid advertising that is 100%
> truth?  Why should photography be the only 100% truth?
> 
> Apropos the comment about a Pulitzer for unmanipulated images... are you
> sure there has never been any darkroom "magic" done to improve a Pulitzer
> winning picture?  It is only the amount of that manipulation that seem to
> bother people.
> 
> It is all perception.
> 
> Frank Filippone
> red735i@earthlink.net
> 
> --
> To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html
- --
To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html

Replies: Reply from "GeeBee" <graham@geebeespaw.freeserve.co.uk> (Re: [Leica] fired for photoshopping)
Reply from Mark Rabiner <mark@rabinergroup.com> (Re: [Leica] fired for photoshopping)
In reply to: Message from "Frank Filippone" <red735i@earthlink.net> (RE: [Leica] fired for photoshopping)