Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2003/03/16
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]There's no reason not to do that either. Infact, having more R than M lenses I'd prefer it. Kludge huh Javier - --- langhans <langhans@compwrx.com> wrote: > Now there's a kludge if I've ever hear of one. If > you are going to us R > lenses, why not a digital back on an R? By the time > you put R lenses and a > digital back of some kind on am M, where's the > M???????? > > Aram > > > Date: Sun, 16 Mar 2003 00:11:41 -0800 (PST) > > From: Javier Perez <summarex@yahoo.com> > > Subject: Re: [Leica] Latest shot from a digital > with a Leica lens > > Message-ID: > <20030316081141.73291.qmail@web40811.mail.yahoo.com> > > References: > > > > What's to acomplish? > > It's been done on every medium format camera > except > > Kowas! > > There's absolutely no reason not to have a db > > available for an M. If it's a big mp back the > > bottom and film space could also be used. As for > the > > motordrive, I could do without it. As for the > short > > non retro lenses longer than 28 it shouldn't be an > > issue. Adapted R lenses below could be used since > rf > > coupling isn't necessary and the ccd can be used > for > > focusing. There is no excuse for not having a db > for > > the Ms and Rs. If there were no one would ever but > an > > LF to eos adapter! > > Javier > > > -- > To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html __________________________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! Web Hosting - establish your business online http://webhosting.yahoo.com - -- To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html