Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2003/03/03
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]To me the posting of a copyrighted, private email was a question of ethics, not whether someone was "bad". "Fascinating" seeing your posts on this as compared to your posts when you see another ethical question that you call "conflict of interest". It would seem our ethical beliefs differ but that is understandable. As to Erwin Puts' writing as it is now posted on his website his assessment can be discussed if you chose. Dennis bdcolen wrote: > Fascinating the entire thread about Erwin and the MP was devoted to how > and why what he wrote got posted to the LUG, and whether someone's doing > so made them a bad person - rather than to Mr. Puts' assessment of the > camera. > > -----Original Message----- > From: owner-leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us > [mailto:owner-leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us] On Behalf Of Christer > Almqvist > Sent: Sunday, March 02, 2003 3:54 AM > To: leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us > Subject: RE: [Leica] Erwin Put's Essay on the MP > > >Jerry-- > > > >We aren't a franchise, just so you know. Leica doesn't sell franchises. > > Funny they have not thought of that, given all the other things they > sell. > > Chris > > > One > >establishes a dealership by agreeing to buy and sell Leica cameras and > >products, and by agreeing to pay one's bills to Leica. ;-) > > > >Kit > > -- > Christer Almqvist > D 20255 Hamburg and / or > F 50590 Regnéville sur Mer - -- To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html