Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2003/02/17

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: RE: [Leica] LUG Politics
From: "Kit McChesney | acmefoto" <kitmc@acmefoto.com>
Date: Mon, 17 Feb 2003 17:56:07 -0700

Good lord. Is this list full of survivalists, or what? ;-)

Kit

- -----Original Message-----
From: owner-leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us
[mailto:owner-leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us]On Behalf Of Marc James
Small
Sent: Monday, February 17, 2003 4:10 PM
To: leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us
Subject: [Leica] The Wall Street JOURNAL and Jim Hemenway


At 05:15 PM 2/17/03 -0500, Jim Hemenway wrote:
>The WSJ for example, is enough to make me vomit... so I imagine Austin
>might feel the same about something like the Boston Globe/NY Times. :)
>
>Jim "Leica using LIBERAL Democrat", Hemenway

Thank God, Jim!  FINALLY someone points out just how outre Left-Wing the
Wall Street Journal is!

They constantly advocate a greater government role in everything, and this
is generally FEDERAL control.

All government is best accomplished at the lowest level, to allow folks
direct contact with their representatives.  All problems which need
addressing are best addressed at the local level, to allow the locals to
determine the solutions to their own problems.  This has been the credo of
the American conservative for several centuries.

Despite this, the Wall Street Journal continues to advocate Socialist
measures such as the existence of the Federal Reserve.

Thanks, Jim, for reminding us just how out of touch the JOURNAL is.

Marc

msmall@infi.net  FAX:  +276/343-7315
Cha robh bąs fir gun ghrąs fir!

- --
To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html

- --
To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html

Replies: Reply from Bill Satterfield <cwsat@istate.net> (Re: [Leica] LUG Politics)
Reply from Brian Reid <reid@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us> (RE: [Leica] LUG Politics)