Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2003/02/14

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: Re: [Leica] Re: Hexar RF Back focus one more time
From: Jerry Lehrer <jerryleh@pacbell.net>
Date: Fri, 14 Feb 2003 13:52:47 -0800
References: <200302131714.JAA11678@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us> <a05111700ba71d2acb52f@[218.102.82.212]> <00fb01c2d3d8$e7153a80$6f01a8c0@jsbigrig> <008401c2d44e$ce94efc0$2dd871d8@jbilinsk> <p05100306ba73025aec3b@[209.53.33.241]>

Henning

Why don't the doubters realize, that with a short focal length lens,
any error in the back focus becomes a greater proportion of it's
movement from infinity to (say) 1 meter.

Jerry


Henning Wulff wrote:

> At 9:30 AM -0800 2/14/03, Jacques Bilinski & Barbara Bradbury wrote:
> >  > I'm sure this has been covered but why would you test a lenses/bodys focus
> >>  using a wide angle @ infinity? Wouldn't you want to use a tele @ the
> >minimum
> >>  focusing distance ???????????????????????????????????????????
> >>
> >
> >You want to do the test at infinity rather than a close focus distance in
> >order to test the lens/body compatibility independantly of the rangefinder
> >adjustments. Rangefinders in RF cameras easily get out of adjustment if the
> >camera is banged, and this won't play a part in the test if you do it at
> >infinity.
> >
> >You want the widest aperature lens you have in order to minimise the depth
> >of focus (i.e. depth of field inside the camera at the film plane).
> >
> >Focal length doesn't matter, contarary to what is often written on this
> >list.  Best lens for this test is a Noctlux.
>
> Focal length can make the test easier because if the flange - film
> distance is 1mm too large, the lens will be focussed at a shorter
> distance; with a wide angle lens this distance will be significantly
> closer to the camera than with a longer focal length lens, and thus
> the discrepancy will show up. As I mentioned before, if the
> discrepancy between the Hexar and the Leica bodies is as large as
> some have said, a 35 lens would focus at about 6m instead of
> infinity. A Summilux wide open would show this discrepancy easily. A
> Noctilux would focus at about 12m with the same film - flange
> discrepancy; that is why it is easier to see with a wideangle lens.
>
> --
>     *            Henning J. Wulff
>    /|\      Wulff Photography & Design
>   /###\   mailto:henningw@archiphoto.com
>   |[ ]|     http://www.archiphoto.com
> --
> To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html

- --
To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html

In reply to: Message from Cummer <cummer@netvigator.com> ([Leica] Re: Hexar RF Back focus one more time)
Message from "John Straus" <Mail@SlideOne.com> (Re: [Leica] Re: Hexar RF Back focus one more time)
Message from "Jacques Bilinski & Barbara Bradbury" <jbilin@axionet.com> (Re: [Leica] Re: Hexar RF Back focus one more time)
Message from Henning Wulff <henningw@archiphoto.com> (Re: [Leica] Re: Hexar RF Back focus one more time)