Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2003/02/13
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]I'm using the Epson 2200 and scanning with the CanoScan 4000 35mm film scanner. I found the FARE(Canon's dust and scratch removal) to be a sharper program than ICE. No need for the unsharp mask with FARE. On Microtek/Polariod scanners: The Microtek 4000tf comes with SilverFast 6.0 where the Polaroid comes with 5.0. The Microtek was my choice for a 4000dpi film scanner until I got a like new CanoScan for a great deal. The problem with DMAX is that all the companies stretch the truth. Canon is under $1000. Nikon is still over $1400 w/rebates Microtek is $1100 or less. Canon is slower than Nikon, but worth every extra second. In March, Epson will have the 3200 flatbed for North America. Chris New Orleans - ----- Original Message ----- From: <Tom.Henson@bakerbotts.com> Subject: [Leica] Film Scanners > Hello to all. > > Now that I have a working M7 with 35 and 75 Summilux lenses, I am working > toward a digital darkroom of sorts. > > After researching the LUG archives and other sources, I purchased the Epson > 2200 printer. I am learning right now from various sources how to use this > great printer. There is definitely a learning curve to this level of > printing. > > My next addition will be a film scanner and I have also been searching the > archives and websites for feedback and reviews. - -- To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html