Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2003/01/19

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: RE: [Leica] RE: New/Old Tri-X?
From: Tim Atherton <tim@KairosPhoto.com>
Date: Sun, 19 Jan 2003 16:23:09 -0700

from what IO understand, based on reported discussion with Kodak technicians
involved in it, the emulsion remains substantially the same, the differences
come from the changes in the base.

tim

> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us
> [mailto:owner-leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us]On Behalf Of Steve
> Unsworth
> Sent: Sunday, January 19, 2003 3:46 PM
> To: leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us
> Subject: RE: [Leica] RE: New/Old Tri-X?
>
>
> May not be much help but the times for Xtol have hardly changed.
>
> Steve
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us
> [mailto:owner-leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us] On Behalf Of Rafael
> Alday
> Sent: 19 January 2003 23:22
> To: leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us
> Subject: Re: [Leica] RE: New/Old Tri-X?
>
>
> I agrre with you. No film is well-developed at times under 5 minutes.
> Rafael
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Ernest Nitka" <enitka@twcny.rr.com>
> To: <leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us>
> Sent: Sunday, January 19, 2003 9:04 PM
> Subject: Re: [Leica] RE: New/Old Tri-X?
>
>
> > I saw one account that wouldve meant using NEW TriX in my HC110B for
> > only 3.5 minutes instead of the 7.5 - this is too much of a change for
>
> > me.  If I'm going to change anything then it will be my film.  i like
> > TriX but am not married to it.  Appears that Illford will be the
> > recipient of more purchases.  i find HP5+ to be for me very ideal.
> >
> > ernie
> > On Sunday, January 19, 2003, at 02:59  PM, Greg J. Lorenzo wrote:
> >
> > > Some people say that there been only minor changes to the emulsion,
> > > requiring modified processing times. The new formulation is supposed
>
> > > to be more scanner friendly. I suspect that Kodak has also reduced
> the
> > > amount of silver in the film and I prefer to only print B&W in a wet
>
> > > darkroom. Colour film I do scan.
> > >
> > > I've found some of the older stocks of Tri-X still available, but
> > > not
> > > at Camera Stores. I've been buying the old Tri-X because the pull
> > > dates are only one month sooner than the new Tri-X pull dates which
> > > are in 2005.
> > >
> > > Regards,
> > >
> > > Greg
>
>
> --
> To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html
>

- --
To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html