Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2003/01/18
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Thanks for your time and thoughts, Don. Just the foreground branches are in focus. Most of the blacks are solidly black, though there are a couple of areas in the lower corners where the blacks are almost, but not quite, as dark as the upper branches. Since my rental time was just about to end, I put off burning in the corners until the next time. I'm not sure if it is or is not needed, but, in any event, having the two prints to compare would help my printing skills. Mike Leica Users digest wrote: > Leica Users digest Friday, January 17 2003 Volume 23 : Number 364 > > > Date: Fri, 17 Jan 2003 07:21:44 -0500 > From: "Don Dory" <dorysrus@mindspring.com> > Subject: Re: [Leica] 2003 PAW > Message-ID: <000a01c2be22$ffb34760$6401a8c0@oemcomputer> > References: <3E278347.80303@earthlink.net> > > Mike, I don't know why you are cringing. > http://home.earthlink.net/~mtr44/2.jpg > This is a pretty good "fine art" found abstract. From a web image I can't > tell if the DOF is front to back or if just the foreground branches are in > focus. Likewise, from a web image there is no way to determine if the > blacks fall to an inky darkness. I do however like the light on the > foreground branches promising a bit of the old forest. > > Don > dorysrus@mindspring.com > > - -- > To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html > - -- To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html