Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2002/12/20

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: Re: [Leica] CLA On A Lens
From: Bill Satterfield <cwsat@istate.net>
Date: Fri, 20 Dec 2002 08:08:01 -0600
References: <d2.2163299d.2b342e15@aol.com>

What  I meant was ......On a body some people get one routinely even 
though camera seems to operate to factory specs. I do not think routine 
CLA on lens is the general practice. Long time ago, Leica ran ads for a 
sale on CLAs for lens and bodies.

V8PWR@aol.com wrote:

>A thousand possible reasons here :
>
>Soft Picures 
>Foggy lens 
>Hard to focus 
>Sand in the lens 
>Salt in the lens 
>Water in the lens 
>Insects in the lens 
>Brocken lens 
>Dissassembled lens
>Diaphragm ring too soft 
>.....
>
>Jo GOODTIMES
>
>>When is a CLA needed on lens
>>
>--
>To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html
>



- --
To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html

In reply to: Message from V8PWR@aol.com (Re: [Leica] CLA On A Lens)