Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2002/12/16

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: REALLY OT - RE: [Leica] digital results
From: "Austin Franklin" <darkroom@ix.netcom.com>
Date: Mon, 16 Dec 2002 12:26:52 -0500

Hi Sam,

Compare the specs, side by side...and see what you note for differences.
For one, the Canon has higher ISO...1250, and the Nikon has a high of 800.
The Canon is faster (fps) and can sustain more frames.  There are other
differences...

Regards,

Austin

> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us
> [mailto:owner-leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us]On Behalf Of Sam Krneta
> Sent: Monday, December 16, 2002 12:01 PM
> To: leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us
> Subject: RE: [Leica] digital results
>
>
> Austin,
>
> Would that be the sensor that is not as good in your eyes or are we
> talking about body functions. I imagine if Nikon uses the 14 MP sensor
> it will be a different animal if they base it on the F5 body and its
> associated systems. Focus, frames per second and the like.
>
> Sam Krneta
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us
> [mailto:owner-leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us] On Behalf Of Austin
> Franklin
> Sent: Monday, December 16, 2002 8:48 AM
> To: leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us
> Subject: RE: [Leica] digital results
>
> Interestingly enough, from what I can tell of the specs, the Nikon/Kodak
> 14m
> sensor camera isn't near as "good" as the Canon.  I was surprised.
>
> Austin

- --
To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html