Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2002/12/16
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Hi Sam, Compare the specs, side by side...and see what you note for differences. For one, the Canon has higher ISO...1250, and the Nikon has a high of 800. The Canon is faster (fps) and can sustain more frames. There are other differences... Regards, Austin > -----Original Message----- > From: owner-leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us > [mailto:owner-leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us]On Behalf Of Sam Krneta > Sent: Monday, December 16, 2002 12:01 PM > To: leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us > Subject: RE: [Leica] digital results > > > Austin, > > Would that be the sensor that is not as good in your eyes or are we > talking about body functions. I imagine if Nikon uses the 14 MP sensor > it will be a different animal if they base it on the F5 body and its > associated systems. Focus, frames per second and the like. > > Sam Krneta > > > -----Original Message----- > From: owner-leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us > [mailto:owner-leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us] On Behalf Of Austin > Franklin > Sent: Monday, December 16, 2002 8:48 AM > To: leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us > Subject: RE: [Leica] digital results > > Interestingly enough, from what I can tell of the specs, the Nikon/Kodak > 14m > sensor camera isn't near as "good" as the Canon. I was surprised. > > Austin - -- To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html