Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2002/12/08
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]On 12/7/02 11:02 AM, "Frank Farmer" <frankandaubrey@mindspring.com> wrote: > Miranda rights are required for "custodial interrogation." That term is often > debated, but basically , if you can't leave, then you must be mirandized. > That includes the officer holding your driver's license at a traffic stop if I > remember my crimial law correctly. I don't practice that very much. > > Frank > > On Fri, 06 Dec 2002 10:40:21 -0800 Bryan Caldwell <bcaldwell51@earthlink.net> > wrote: > Frank, It is never the case that you MUST be Mirandized - meaning that if you are not, you must automatically be released or that the charges against you must automatically be dismissed. Failure to give Miranda warnings only means that any statements you make that are the result of in-custody questioning cannot be used against you in the prosecution's case-in-chief. If you are detained or arrested and the police don't intend to question you, they don't need to Mirandize you. Un-Mirandized responses to police questioning can be used to rebut contradictory testimony that you give at a later date. For this reason, not giving Miranda warnings can often be a tactical decision on the part of law enforcement. If you are questioned without having been given the Miranda warnings, your statements may prevent you from effectively testifying on your own behalf at a later trial or other proceeding. I think that television and movies have given many people mistaken impressions about Miranda. I often have clients who are charged with criminal offenses and think that all charges against them have to be dropped because they were never Mirandized. This is not the case. It is true that, in some cases, the prosecution's case cannot be proven without the use of an un-Mirandized statement. In those cases, if the defense attorney makes the appropriate objection and prevails on the issue, the case will likely be dismissed. But, if the prosecution can prove their case without using an un-Mirandized statement, the case will go forward. Miranda has no effect on the legality of an arrest - it deals with the admissibility of statements made by an in-custody suspect that are the result of police questioning. Bryan - -- To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html