Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2002/12/04

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: RE: [Leica] Canada... (sensitive luggers DO NOT READ!) you'dthink that it was another country!
From: "bdcolen" <bdcolen@earthlink.net>
Date: Wed, 4 Dec 2002 16:46:30 -0500

ROFLOL!!!!

- -----Original Message-----
From: owner-leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us
[mailto:owner-leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us] On Behalf Of Tim
Atherton
Sent: Wednesday, December 04, 2002 4:15 PM
To: leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us
Subject: Re: [Leica] Canada... (sensitive luggers DO NOT READ!)
you'dthink that it was another country!


If you a sesntive US Lugger of a delicate dispostion (you know who you 
are) DO NOT READ ANY FURTHER... if you do, it's your own fault :-)

As a recent cartoon I cam across said:

"we are bigger and on top - if this was jail you'd be our bitch!"


- ----- Original Message -----
From: "Jeffrey Fass" <happy.eyeball@verizon.net>
Date: Wednesday, December 4, 2002 10:24 am
Subject: Re: [Leica] Canada... you'd think that it was another country!

> Isn't Canada a state, or am I missing something?
> 
> Anonymous
> 
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "bdcolen" <bdcolen@earthlink.net>
> To: <leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us>
> Sent: Wednesday, December 04, 2002 10:07 AM
> Subject: RE: [Leica] Canada... you'd think that it was another 
> country!
> 
> > "Canada is not in the U.S."
> > 
> > Yet. ;-)
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: owner-leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us
> > [mailto:owner-leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us] On Behalf Of Jim 
> > Hemenway
> > Sent: Wednesday, December 04, 2002 9:57 AM
> > To: leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us
> > Subject: [Leica] Canada... you'd think that it was another country!
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > Re: Item # 1791095985
> > 
> > > "Canada is not in the US"
> > 
> > I asked the seller about this when I "picked up" the light
> table.  He
> > said that he includes it because of the many Canadian bidders
> who can't
> > accept his policy of shipping only to the lower 48 states.
> > 
> > He volunteered that he also found it necessary to include "you
> will be
> > responsible for all shipping charges," because so many people don't 
> > understand the meaning of the preceding phrase, "Freight Collect."
> > 
> > --
> > Jim - http://www.hemenway.com
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > Stuart Phillips wrote:
> > > 
> > > "Canada is not in the US"
> > > This will not surprise Canadians, but may puzzle the millions
> of young
> > 
> > > Americans who couldn't find the Pacific Ocean recently.
> > > ----- Original Message -----
> > > From: "Greg J. Lorenzo" <gregj.lorenzo@shaw.ca>
> > > To: <leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us>
> > > Sent: Tuesday, December 03, 2002 10:23 PM
> > > Subject: Re: [Leica] Time-line: focal length in centimeters
> versus
> > > millimeters on projection lenses, Epidiaskop IIIs
> > > 
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Martin Howard wrote in part:
> > > >
> > > > > For a good laugh, read the "Shipping Method" statement
> carefully.>
> > > > > I wonder if it's put there for the benefit of Canadians,
> or
> > > > > Americans...? ;)
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > I think the Canadians win!
> > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > M.
> > > > >
> > > > > --
> > > > > To unsubscribe, see
> > > > > http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > > To unsubscribe, see
> > > > http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html
> > > 
> > > --
> > > To unsubscribe, see
> > > http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html
> > --
> > To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-
> users/unsub.html>
> > --
> > To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-
> users/unsub.html>
> --
> To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-
> users/unsub.html

- --
To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html

- --
To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html