Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2002/12/03

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: RE: [Leica] Reflex vs. RF
From: "bdcolen" <bdcolen@earthlink.net>
Date: Tue, 3 Dec 2002 16:27:16 -0500

This is really wild..."If Leica was to re-release an outdated, outmoded
camera, what features would you want it to have?" ROFLOL!

Why not ask "what features should they leave off again?"

- -----Original Message-----
From: owner-leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us
[mailto:owner-leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us] On Behalf Of Douglas
Herr
Sent: Tuesday, December 03, 2002 4:10 PM
To: leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us
Subject: Re: [Leica] Reflex vs. RF


On Tue, 3 Dec 2002 15:14:39 -0500 Jeffrey Fass
<happy.eyeball@verizon.net>
wrote:

> I can tell that, in working the deal with
> Minolta, Leica made a body with the soul of a 
> consumer Japanese model, at least that's how it 
> feels.

Yup.

> What's going on inside is a different story I'm
> sure.

Nope.  There are some internal differences between the R3-R7 series and
the Minolta counterparts, but these R bodies aren't as rugged as the
Leicaflexes or the R8/R9.




Doug Herr<BR>Birdman of Sacramento<BR>http://www.wildlightphoto.com
- --
To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html

- --
To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html

Replies: Reply from Bill Stanke <bstanke@turbonet.com> (Re: [Leica] Reflex vs. RF)