Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2002/12/03

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: Re: [Leica] Reflex vs. RF
From: "Douglas Herr"<telyt@earthlink.net>
Date: Tue, 03 Dec 2002 11:27:32 -0800

On Tue, 3 Dec 2002 14:17:45 -0500 Jeffrey Fass <happy.eyeball@verizon.net>
wrote:
 
> After having used the M for only several months
> I was struck how different
> and strange the R felt.  The viewfinder is
> darker, the 90 makes everything
> *big* in the viewfinder (I've become used to
> the M 90 frameline). Most
> significant is the *slonk* of the
> mirror/shutter. It's got quite a kick to
> it. The M is so stealthy by comparison.
> 
> Mind, in general I think, at least comparing
> the R4, Nikon has the reflex
> thing down. Quieter, smoother, faster. The
> lenses are a whole 'nuther story,
> though.
>
 
If you want a real Leica reflex, try a Leicaflex SL.  Much brighter
viewfinder, smoother mirror/shutter action, less shutter lag, and it feels
solid the way a Leica ought to.  The SL even smells like a real Leica.
 

Doug Herr<BR>Birdman of Sacramento<BR>http://www.wildlightphoto.com
- --
To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html