Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2002/11/24

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: RE: [Leica] Re: 50mm Voigtlander
From: Jim Shulman <garcia@chesco.com>
Date: Sun, 24 Nov 2002 19:45:55 -0500

Well, I would have!

Jim Shulman
Bryn Mawr, PA



- -----Original Message-----
From: owner-leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us
[mailto:owner-leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us] On Behalf Of Martin
Howard
Sent: Sunday, November 24, 2002 7:41 PM
To: leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us
Subject: Re: [Leica] Re: 50mm Voigtlander

On Sunday, Nov 24, 2002, at 15:25 America/Los_Angeles, Phong wrote:

> Nathan posted  a Voigtlander Nokton 50mm f1.5 shot:
>>> http://www.wajsman.com/21.jpg
>
> to which Steve LeHuray countered with this 50mm Summilux shot:
>> http://www.streetphoto.net/images/im120.jpg
>
>
> This is unfair to the extreme.

Yeah, but imagine how she might have reacted if Steve had asked her, 
"excuse me, madam, but would you mind bending over so I can take a shot 
of your arse?  I need to compare it to one taken with a 50mm f/1.5 
Nokton lens."

M.

- --
To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html

- --
To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html

Replies: Reply from Nathan Wajsman <wajsman@webshuttle.ch> (Re: [Leica] Re: 50mm Voigtlander)