Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2002/11/21

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: Re: [Leica] FS: Leica M3 and 35mm f/2.8 Summaron with Eyes
From: "Ted Bayer" <tedbayer@charter.net>
Date: Thu, 21 Nov 2002 16:55:37 -0800
References: <20021121211638.76894.qmail@web10501.mail.yahoo.com>

Hi Patrick:

You are not alone in telling me this.  Several other good people have given
me the same advice.  But the deed is done, and I am now owner of two Leicas
which is more than feel I can justify (and my good wife feels the same).
Having said that, I agree that it would be nice to keep the M3 as the one I
have works really well.  But I made a choice based on my desire to have the
in-camera meter - plus a little less age on the camera itself.  But I am
happy with the choice.

Thanks for caring enough to take time to pass on this good advice.

Ted

- ----- Original Message -----
From: "patrick jelliffe" <pbjbike@yahoo.com>
To: <leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us>
Sent: Thursday, November 21, 2002 1:16 PM
Subject: Re: [Leica] FS: Leica M3 and 35mm f/2.8 Summaron with Eyes


> Don't sell your M3 if you can afford to keep it.  I
> prefer my M2 to my M6 because of the M6 finder flare,
> and regret selling my M3.
>
> Patrick
>
> __________________________________________________
> Do you Yahoo!?
> Yahoo! Mail Plus - Powerful. Affordable. Sign up now.
> http://mailplus.yahoo.com
> --
> To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html
>


- --
To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html

In reply to: Message from patrick jelliffe <pbjbike@yahoo.com> (Re: [Leica] FS: Leica M3 and 35mm f/2.8 Summaron with Eyes)