Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2002/11/04

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: Re: [Leica] Reformulated Tri-X?
From: Rolfe Tessem <rolfe@ldp.com>
Date: Mon, 04 Nov 2002 14:16:08 -0500
References: <Pine.SOL.4.44.0211041008120.17737-100000@tetris.gpcc.itd.umich. edu>

- --On Monday, November 4, 2002 10:17 AM -0500 Dante Stella <dante@umich.edu> 
wrote:

>
> Rolfe, let's put it this way.
>
> Kodak led the charge up the B&W hill with the T-grain films and the
> ascorbic-acid developers, easily outspending Fuji, Agfa and Ilford in the
> process.
>
> Black and white technology is completely mature; in terms of
> ultimate usable resolution, we have been at a plateau since the 1950s,
> when someone discovered that document films have the highest resolution.
> In fact, the current alleged "gigibit" films are nothing more than
> document films.
>
> Furthermore, the huge price of whatever incremental improvement remains to
> be made cannot be economically justified when B&W is only around 5% of the
> total market.  Kodak has by no means been hostile to the black and white
> market - they just built a new film plant for it -- and kept Verichrome
> Pan in production long after Agfa quit with APX 25.

Dante,

I agree with all of this.

I guess the intended irony of my original remark didn't translate to the 
written word. I was merely observing how ironic it is that Kodak is 
spending all this money on a new B&W plant when all the company's B&W 
experts, including the inventors of Xtol, etc., have long since departed 
Rochester. Given that, it seems unlikely that new B&W developments will 
come from Kodak.

Now, it may be that we really have everything we need and that B&W 
technology is, as you put it, completely mature. But I would note that both 
Fuji and Ilford continue to introduce new B&W emulsions regularly.

> Leica, on the other hand, has not spent any significant money on M line
> bodies, the newest of which is 30 years behind technologically.  Leica has
> not been an innovator for about fifty years in rangefinder bodies, and it
> is nowhere near the limits of what can be done within market constraints.

Well, Seth is the one who added the Leica observation so I'll just leave 
this one alone :-)l

Rolfe

- --
Rolfe Tessem
rolfe@ldp.com
Lucky Duck Productions, Inc.
- --
To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html

Replies: Reply from Roger Cantwell <rcantwell@peeble.co.uk> (Re: [Leica] Reformulated Tri-X?)