Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2002/11/03

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: Re: Re. [Leica] PAWs - Shameless family snapshots OR Serious Portraits
From: "Tom Smart" <tom@sleepytom.com>
Date: Sun, 3 Nov 2002 19:57:56 -0600
References: <5.1.0.14.0.20021101233513.02d412c0@earthlink.net>

Carl,

Thanks so much for the valuable insight.  I appreciate your thoughtful
critique very much.

Tom


- ----- Original Message -----
From: "Carl Pultz" <cpultz@earthlink.net>
To: <leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us>
Sent: Friday, November 01, 2002 11:49 PM
Subject: Re. [Leica] PAWs - Shameless family snapshots OR Serious Portraits


> Tom,
>
> That is a lovely family you have, and you have made better than the
average
> family snaps to represent them. Steven looks a bit unsure of things, but
> shows character, and Claire and Margaret are both pictured very well.
Margo
> has the soft eyes of a contentedly at home with the pack sort of beast.
> They are all comfortable before your lens rather than oppressed and
> intimidated.
>
> The tonal qualities of the shots are very good on my monitor. There's a
> great glow and sparkle to #2 in lighting that could as easily turned out
> harsh.  1 and 3 are not as distinguished in that regard, but the way you
> have dealt with the less interesting light is good anyway.
>
> What each of these shots lack is a degree of compositional refinement. I
> think you are a bit too close in #2 - Margaret's head is too centered, I
> want to see more of the paper or the maybe the way she places her feet or
> crosses her legs - and Steven's expression calls for a high POV, a looming
> above that would make that hint of fright more understandable, more
dramatic.
>
> There are other solutions and other circumstances, but with more attention
> to formalities of composition (not formulas!), your shots would be very
> fine. You have the exposure technique down and certainly great subject
matter.
>
> Someone, writing in defense of family photos, pointed out that many renown
> photographers used their families and friends for subjects. Provocatively,
> Steichen and Weston. Calahan's wife and baby appears in some of his
seminal
> images. There's a lot to be learned in their work. Eggleston, that master
> of the off beat who I revere, when people are present, seems to have
> pictured mostly the people in his life, often in the most ordinary,
prosaic
> ways, yet there is a magic.
>
> Pictures needn't be shocking or archly weird or contrived to justify
family
> shots as artistic works. Capturing character and depth might come most
> naturally with one's closest companions. Why not?
>
> Anyway, I mean to say you can be on your way to making fine things.
>
> Carl
>
> --
> To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html

- --
To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html

In reply to: Message from Carl Pultz <cpultz@earthlink.net> (Re. [Leica] PAWs - Shameless family snapshots OR Serious Portraits)