Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2002/10/01
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Sal DiMarco,Jr.sdmp007@pressroom.com (Sal DiMarco,Jr.)10/1/025:46 PM >Yes, the film is eaten by the machine, so there are no negatives... It >is interesting, but the quality is less than acceptable. What's the point? If you have film capable of a given quality, and providing a permanent (more or less) file copy; why would you want less quality and destruction of the file copy. Is the whole point speed? And if so wouldn't a digital camera still provide more speed? What am I missing here? - -- To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html