Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2002/09/26

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: RE: [Leica] Last Thursday's portrait session.
From: "Felix Erazo" <ferazo2000@yahoo.com>
Date: Thu, 26 Sep 2002 11:16:52 -0400

Hi Rob, I left my comments on your page.
http://www.leica-gallery.net/heymanphoto/image-33587.html

Regards
Felix Erazo
www.thrutheviewfinder.com
www.thrutheviewfinder.com/PAW.html



- -----Original Message-----
From: owner-leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us
[mailto:owner-leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us] On Behalf Of Rob Heyman
Sent: Wednesday, September 25, 2002 5:48 PM
To: leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us
Subject: Re: [Leica] Last Thursday's portrait session.

Fair comment, B.D.  I have others without the cyclist, but as we were
choosing
the shot for their wall, we kept coming back to this one. The others
looked a
little bland without the bike.
It is very easy to remove it, but it will remain. When the bike is moved
to the
side there is a conflict with the lamp post. As it is, it may be that it
is a
mutifaceted image, with more points of interest than the couple. I am
also a
little confused about it, but the LUG is a good place to get feed-back.

I will post an alternate image within the nexy few minutes. Would
welcome your
comments.

Thanks, mate,
Rob

"B. D. Colen" wrote:

> I'm loath to say this, Rob, as I really admire your family portraiture
- - but
> there is something seriously distracting about the bicyclist in this
one.
> I'm not sure whether it's the fact that the cyclist is riding on the
top of
> the subjects' heads, or whether it would also bother me if the cyclist
was
> off to the right...but it just doesn't work for me.
>

- --
To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html


- --
To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html