Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2002/08/15
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]on 8/15/02 5:49 PM, bdcolen at bdcolen@earthlink.net wrote: > Well, there are two possibilities here - either they were testing the > LuxASPH, or the test isn't worth a damn....and I have to say that the > test sounds pretty poor anyway, as no 35 1.4 at 1.4 is going to do as > well as a 35 2 at f2...or were they only comparing the lenses from f 2 > onward. If that's the case, it's still a foolish test, because if you > buy a 35 1.4 you - hopefully - buy it because you need the speed. So > whether it performs quite as well at slower speeds as slower lenses > becomes somewhat irrelivant. > > B. D. I thought these were all 50's :) - -- John Straus Chicago, IL http://SlideOne.com http://SlideOne.com/EditorsRoom ========================== - -- To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html