Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2002/08/04

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: Re: [Leica] For anyone who still thinks that digital isn't really...
From: Mark Rabiner <mark@markrabiner.com>
Date: Sun, 04 Aug 2002 13:44:44 -0700
References: <MBBBJHIBKCKEAEOKKBPOEEMPECAA.bdcolen@earthlink.net> <3D4D47EF.5040402@widomaker.com>

Mike Durling wrote:
> 
> Well, we all have to accept the fact that even in there film-based forms
> the Nikons and Canons out-sell the Leicas probably by an order of
> magnitude or two.
> 
> Leica, unlike the others, has to compete with every other Leica ever
> sold, because they are still servicable.  If you have a Canon D30 then
> the D60 is almost a must-have item.  Digital echnology has changed quite
> a bit in a few years.  For an M6 user, an M7 is just another body with
> one more bell and whistle.  Then you have the Canon AE-1 which can't be
> repaired because the chips aren't made any more.


It's possible that it will work out that the M7 is not just a body with
one more bell and whistle. But critically more.
I think the sync system which goes to 1000th of a second is the Big Bell
the A setting a whistle.

I think a huge percentage of Pros found the M6 untenable because of the
low sync speed.
Now they can be out there in the blazing sunlight with their flashes....
...And their M7's. And their Leica glass.


Mark Rabiner
Portland, Oregon USA
http://www.markrabiner.com
- --
To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html

In reply to: Message from "B. D. Colen" <bdcolen@earthlink.net> ([Leica] For anyone who still thinks that digital isn't really...)
Message from Mike Durling <durling@widomaker.com> (Re: [Leica] For anyone who still thinks that digital isn't really...)