Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2002/08/02
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Tina Manley <images@InfoAve.Net> writes: > I don't get it. The underwater ones are nice but most of the others > look like snapshots. The ones on her website > http://www.in-public.com/autiofolio.html all look underexposed and > too contrasty. Can somebody explain why these photos are exceptional? I rather like these, at least the ones on the Leica site. I tend to be drawn toward 'underexposed' images anyway. There is something rather mystical to a good dark photo. I guess most of my preference for it comes from my love of Roy DeCarava's work though - he has to be one of my all time favorites and much of his work is 'underexposed'. Cheers, Dave - -- To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html