Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2002/07/31
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Jeffery, so far I have only used it as a two-bath compensating developer. As such, I've used it with Tri-X, Fuji Neopan 400, Paterson's own 200 speed film (forgot the name!), and Plus-X. All were high contrast situations and the developer performed well with each film. I've tried three of the four Paterson film developers and none was a dud. Allan Jeffery Smith wrote: > Thanks Allan. Which films do you favor in it? > > At 09:39 PM 7/31/2002 -0400, you wrote: >> FX-50 is the brand name, I believe. It can be used three different >> ways. I have it; I love it. The Paterson developers are all good. >> B&H Photo carries it. >> >> Allan >> >> >> On Wednesday, July 31, 2002, at 09:34 AM, Jeffery Smith wrote: >>> Roger Hicks just wrote an article in Shutterbug singing the praises >>> of Paterson developers. Have any of you tried the two-bath ascorbate >>> (non-toxic) developer? >>> >>> Jeffery >>> >>> >>> -- >>> To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica- >>> users/unsub.html >> >> -- >> To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html > > > > -- > To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html - -- To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html