Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2002/07/30
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Ernie, I would go for the 50/2 or even 35/2, wide open and exposure time at 10 - 20 seconds (400 - 800 Film). Longer times would get more meteors on the film but due to the earths rotation, stars would appear rather as lines than as spots on film. I don't see why M or R should make any difference. Regards, Jan >The winter shower I shot with SL and 21/4 lens on Fuji 800 - results >photographically were +/-. I did it after a dinner party were much alcohol >was consumed and I had a cold - I paid for it for days. Anyway I am >rethinking my lens choice - perhaps just a 50/2. Wonder if an M would be >better or if a different selection of lenses is better. Any thoughts? > >ernie nitka > >"The reasonable man adapts himself to the world: the unreasonable man >persists in trying to adapt the world to himself. Therefore all >progress depends on the unreasonable man." - George Bernard Shaw > > >-- >To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html Jan Schuller Tieche Str. 51 CH - 8037 Zurich www.unizh.ch/~schuller/ _________________________________________________________________ Chat with friends online, try MSN Messenger: http://messenger.msn.com - -- To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html