RE: [Leica] LHSA Meetings. It's not just about cameras anymore.

["B. D. Colen" <bdcolen@earthlink.net>]

But as an outside observer, it strikes me that they aren't sweating you at
all - they are simply choosing which dimension to put first. You, on the
other hand, are sweating them - giving them a boatload of shit over which
dimension must be stated first, and threatening to pull your photos from the
show - catalogue - when they won't state it your way. Or, to put it another
way, threatening to run your nose over with a tractor trailer to show your
face who's boss. What, precisely, was proven by that exercise? That the
photos are 8x10? Until turned the other way? ;-)

B. D.

- -----Original Message-----
From: owner-leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us
[mailto:owner-leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us]On Behalf Of S Dimitrov
Sent: Tuesday, July 30, 2002 12:21 AM
To: leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us
Subject: Re: [Leica] LHSA Meetings. It's not just about cameras anymore.


To tell the truth, I really didn't care one way or another about the
size.
It just came down to not having some art world skank sweating me with
their this and that's.
Slobodan Dimitrov


Tim Atherton wrote:
>
> > In the US, the art gallery world and their sycophants have decided that
> > my 8x10 print is now an 10x8. Just a month ago I had a 'discussion' with
> > an editor of a catalogue about the size of my prints. It finally got to
> > where I about to pull my work out if they were to mis-identify it's
> > size. I had them sign off in writing that the size is an 8x10.
> > Slobodan Dimitrov
>
> mind you, your work is 10x8 isn't it...?
>
> Is it 2x4 or a 4x2 behind that drywall...  :-)
>
> tim
> --
> To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html
- --
To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html

- --
To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html