Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2002/06/29

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: Re: [Leica] Leica M3 vs Fuji 6x9
From: Jeffery Smith <jls@runbox.com>
Date: Sat, 29 Jun 2002 16:59:27 -0500

The big Fuji goes. Five pounds is too much baggage even for Ken.

You know they're going to fry you here for selling an M3 because you 
already have a Hexar RF. Your brain MUST have been cooked when you wrote 
this. ;-)

Jeffery

At 03:24 PM 6/29/2002 -0400, you wrote:

>Ok... I spent the entire afternoon so far sunning and reading Mortensen's
>"The Negative."  Maybe my brain is cooked.
>
>So the hypothetical is: one stays and one goes.  But which?
>
>One is an M3 SS PV ST DOF used with 50/1.4 (Sonnar-style) and 105/2.5 (also
>Sonnar) Nikkor lenses.  One is a Fuji 6x9 rangefinder with 100/3.5 (Tessar)
>and 180/5.6 (Sonnar, cf distance 8 feet) interchangeable lenses.
>
>These are the parameters:
>-- I have a Hexar RF and a Fuji GA645, so there would not be a huge
>capability loss either way
>-- The Fuji weighs 5 pounds with a lens.  I call it the "Ken" camera because
>to me it is oversized just like a camera Barbie would have.
>-- With a 15x loupe, I don't see much difference in what is resolved on film
>-- I normally use TMX in 35mm and Tri-X in medium format.
>-- Each would sell for about the same amount if I booted it (well, Leica
>body vs. 6x9 outfit).
>
>Knowing that this is a place where people are all over the place on issues
>like this, what are your thoughts?
>
>Regards
>------------
>Dante Stella
>http://www.dantestella.com
>
>--
>To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html


- --
To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html