Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2002/06/25

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] Re: 2nd PAW (or PAM)
From: Christer Almqvist <>
Date: Tue, 25 Jun 2002 10:56:13 +0200
References: <> <00c201c21bec$36c66a40$cadc6843@hal>

>I am venturing forth, with trepidation, again into the jaws of criticism
>with a second photo:
>Comments invited.


when I looked at this picture it had been viewed 85 times and no 
comment. From that I conclude that the LUGgers are a lot nicer than 
is generally thought. I am an exception. This is not going to be a 
nice comment. This picture is only of any value to the nearest 
family. (I better stop commenting here.)

Why do you think it is worth publishing to a larger audience 
interested in high class photography? Why are you proud of this 
picture as a photograph (not as a record of your family)?  These are 
not rhetoric questions, your answer would interest me.

Best regards,

>To unsubscribe, see

- -- 
Christer Almqvist
D 20255 Hamburg and / or
F 50590 Regnéville sur Mer
- --
To unsubscribe, see

In reply to: Message from ([Leica] Re: 2nd PAW (or PAM))