Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2002/06/21

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: Re: [Leica] Jobo processing
From: "Doug Lee" <drlee9@earthlink.net>
Date: Fri, 21 Jun 2002 14:56:50 -0400
References: <00a201c21929$3c0354c0$94a6fea9@3zlwb> <200206211742.g5LHgNI5009699@mta3.snet.net>

Roy, thanks for the information. Yes, sounds like a real pain and not
something I would want to contend with. I'd like to enjoy the darkroom
experience.

Again, Thanks

Douglas Richard Lee
Cinnaminson, NJ

- ----- Original Message -----
From: "Roy Zartarian" <rzartarian@snet.net>
To: <leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us>
Sent: Friday, June 21, 2002 1:50 PM
Subject: Re: [Leica] Jobo processing


> On Friday 21 June 2002 09:40 am, Doug Lee wrote:
> > question I have is can you process fiber prints with a JOBO?
Specifically,
> > the CPE-2, CPP-2, or CPA-2 processors.
>
> Yes, you can. But it's a real pain. Exposure tests have to carried through
to
> completion, and you won't know while the paper is in the developer, as you
> would with trays, if your first trial is way off.  The tank has to be
rinsed
> clean and dried before you put the next piece of paper in it. And forget
> about toning in the Jobo - you can't judge the effect and even with
> scrupulous cleaning there is a very real risk of contamination of the
> developer for the next print to go in.
>
> Those are the reasons I use the Jobo for film only.
>
> Roy
> --
> To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html

- --
To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html

In reply to: Message from "Doug Lee" <drlee9@earthlink.net> ([Leica] Jobo processing)
Message from Roy Zartarian <rzartarian@snet.net> (Re: [Leica] Jobo processing)