Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2002/06/06

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]
Subject: Re: [Leica] This is LUG??
From: "Michael J. Murphy" <murchu@ecosse.net>
Date: Thu, 6 Jun 2002 22:46:16 +0100
References: <200206061946.g56JkEg09907@hermes.toad.net> <5660893.1023368037@cambric.reid.org> <007d01c20d98$e2479f90$79881f3e@mjm> <5894706.1023371934@cambric.reid.org>
 
Only three, Brian...We needed twice that number ... Sign of the times, I
guess!

Mike
http://www.scotcolour.com

- ----- Original Message -----
From: "Brian Reid" <reid@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us>
To: <leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us>
Sent: Thursday, June 06, 2002 9:58 PM
Subject: Re: [Leica] This is LUG??


>
>
> > Must burn my PhD diploma!
>
> They're supposed to stand for facts, not opinions. That's why PhD's
usually require three faculty signatures: no other way to know what the
facts are.
>
> --
> To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html

- --
To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html
In reply to: Message from "Steve LeHuray" <icommag@toad.net> (Re: [Leica] This is LUG??)
Message from Brian Reid <reid@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us> (Re: [Leica] This is LUG??)
Message from "Michael J. Murphy" <murchu@ecosse.net> (Re: [Leica] This is LUG??)
Message from Brian Reid <reid@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us> (Re: [Leica] This is LUG??)