Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2002/06/02

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: Re: [Leica] Leica, medium format, and good enough
From: John Straus <Mail@SlideOne.com>
Date: Sun, 02 Jun 2002 02:11:30 -0500

Don this is good info but it ALL depends on what your shooting. It seems
your comparing camera systems and specs more that pure neg to print size and
quality. You (or we) could go on talking forever about the benefits of 35mm
format for fast glass and shooting in this and that situation. If that is
part of your rationalization thatıs ok but the point is that med format
prints 8x10 or 11x14 are better than their 35mm counterparts IMO. AFAIK that
all I was expressing in earlier posts.

- -- 
John Straus
Chicago, IL 
http://SlideOne.com
http://SlideOne.com/EditorsRoom
==========================

on 6/1/02 8:55 PM, Don Dory at dorysrus@mindspring.com wrote:

> John, my point was that up to 11X14 the differences in image quality between
> 35mm and medium format is possibly not worth the effort.  Take the Mamiya 7
> which is the closest to a Leica in size.  Is their anything like a 35 1.4
> ASPH to take images in the shadows or plays or subways?  Framing a Leica
> with a 90 APO is not bad but have you tried framing a Mamiya 7 with the 150?
> 
> Now lets talk about lens speed, usually more than a two stop difference, I
> can shoot 100 and you have to shoot 400 to keep up.  That's all well and
> good in a studio but now lets go out at sunset to capture the good light.  I
> can go to Provia 400F and you will do what?  Now you are talking assistants,
> lights, reflectors, and what not to make it look like you were out in the
> late evening.
> 
> Let's talk about hand holding, let's see, a 90 can be held at 1/60 usually
> and your 150 needs 125 all hands being equal so now I have a three stop
> advantage when the light goes bad.  A 24 can be held at about 1/15 and your
> 43 at 1/30.  The advantage still holds with small format.
> 
> Again, I was talking about image sizes to 11x14.  There is no question that
> at larger sizes to hold image detail a larger film size is desirable.  It's
> just that the uses for the larger sizes is such a small part of the market
> that most work can be shot on a small format.
> 
> Also, I believe that I gave the advantage to medium and larger format when
> swings and tilts were required or Art directors with egos come into play.
> 
> Before anyone gets huffy that I only know Leica I also own and use where
> appropriate brand H and L in medium and larger format as well as a Fuji 690
> which really is a Leica in medium format.
> 
> Don
> dorysrus@mindspring.com
> 
> --
> To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html
> 



- --
To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html